Table of Contents
Samsung let me unhappy with the Galaxy Watch Ultra
I was one of the insufficient Samsung Galaxy Ultra defenders beforehand its presentation. The early seeped images had some cover their children’s eyes, but I gazed on, fascinated by the quirky styling. In my original view piece, I specified that Samsung’s “chunky then brutish styling” could theoretically allow more room to revolutionize. However, the novel ultra-expensive Samsung clothing hasn’t done far to exploit its divisive design. Then if anything, I’ve been left dissatisfied by an overpriced smartwatch that doesn’t bring whatever radical to my wrist.
Sauce with little substance
A few weeks beforehand its debut, I inscribed that Samsung’s exciting novel design then thicker body could let for more ground-breaking packaging, counting space for a larger battery then a host of extra kit. Of sequence, this was well beforehand any tangible details of the device were obtainable. However, Samsung has chosen for a more conservative method than I had hoped, which doesn’t exploit the designs possible.
Despite its studied design, it uses the similar size battery as the Galaxy Watch 5 Pro then the same size show as the Galaxy Watch 6 Classic — two big, cheaper, and more friendly smartwatches.
Unless you’re planning a trek awake Everest before a dive along the Great Barrier Reef, you’ll not ever test the watch’s 10ATM durability before altitude/temperature credentials.
Samsung would contend that the new Ultra design lets for a hypothetically indestructible smartwatch cheers to its grade 4 titanium shell then protective display buffers. Except you plan a trek up Everest or a dive lengthways the Great Barrier Reef, you’ll not ever test the watch’s 10ATM toughness or altitude/temperature identifications. If whatever, the more extreme users this watch is annoying to attract will probably opt for specialized gear. The absence of a meaningful battery volume upgrade and broader show to match the larger dial fails general operators like me.
Outside its divisive skin, greatest of the Galaxy Watch Ultra’s core new topographies are software-based, creation the hardware largely jobless. Granted, it topographies a third button, an backup siren, more LEDs for better well-being tracking, and a new strap tie system. However, most users will gain additional tangible aids from Wear OS 5, which will terrestrial on Samsung’s older timepieces in due course.
Moreover, it shares its internals with the inexpensive Galaxy Watch 7. Most new topographies, including Energy Score, slumber apnea monitoring, and Galaxy AI-powered topographies, will still require a Galaxy smartphone, creation promotion a fruitless view for other Android phone users.
Higher price, less value
More highly — and as the most glaring strike contrary to the Ultra — its promotions are not worth the sheer asking price. At $649, the Galaxy Watch Ultra is the greatest luxurious Samsung smartwatch, shadowing its precursors by hundreds of dollars.
If you can’t count that number, here’s a more tangible contrast. You can buy two Galaxy Watch 7 models for $50 less than one Galaxy Watch Ultra. Your container also buying the Galaxy Ring besides one Galaxy Watch 7 for just $50 more than the Ultra. Then here’s the real kicker: I container purchase a Galaxy S24 Plus in South Africa for the similar price as the Galaxy Watch Ultra. This won’t be factual in every region, but it proves how exaggerated the smartwatch’s price is.
If you want a rocky Samsung smartwatch, grab a Galaxy Watch 7 then slap a case on it. You’ll save hundreds.
The Galaxy Watch 7 should deliver the same core knowledge, with the same chipset, the similar software and fitness trailing smarts, and the same Galaxy AI topographies at a much subordinate price. The 44mm classical also shares its show with the Galaxy Watch Ultra. I’d even contend that the key differences among the two models, specifically the titanium build, the larger battery, then the third key, aren’t that important either.
If you want a rocky Samsung smartwatch, grab a Galaxy Watch 7 besides slap a case on it. You’ll save hundreds. Incongruously, browsing various opportunities this week, I’ve seen so numerous users covering their Galaxy Watch Ultra in a case anyhow.
I’ve contended that the Galaxy Watch 5 Pro is also a far smarter investment if you’re look for an outdoor smartwatch with more stamina and durability. Although it’s two years elder and has dated hardware, the clothing makes a lot more monetary sense.
What does the Galaxy Watch Ultra want to be?
A Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra Rests Together with an Apple Watch Ultra, apiece stress its own Action key.
This transports me to my final opinion: the Galaxy Watch Ultra absences a clear individuality.
Contempt its durability insignia, it isn’t an extreme outside fob watch or an easy-wear smartwatch. It sits in an uncooperative middle ground amid the two. It’s competing by the Apple Watch Ultra but can’t pair with iPhones. It’s accepted stylings from Garmin, but it can’t hold a taper to its fitness trailing metrics or cordless life.
Unlike its Ultra phone, Samsung’s Ultra watch doesn’t stretch the limits of topographies before design.
Samsung marketplaces the Ultra as a tough, impact-ready smartwatch by Galaxy AI smarts, but all that income is it’s a Galaxy Watch 7 in an strengthened shell. Yes, the smartwatch topographies give the Galaxy Ultra a leg up in contradiction of its Apple and Garmin competitors. However, these topographies aren’t sole to the Samsung smartwatch line.
Unlike its Ultra smartphone stroke, Samsung’s Ultra watch doesn’t give the limits of topographies then design as I wanted it would. I want to have faith in that Samsung is planning far-reaching upgrades in the upcoming and that this iterative promotion is only part of its larger strategy. Perhaps I predictable too much and saw an arresting design with big potentials. Either way, what Samsung is vending has left me deficient more or hard a more sensible price.
